Mike Dinovo-USA TODAY Sports

Mike Dinovo-USA TODAY Sports

As the last of the three big-name free agent pitchers this offseason, suffice to say the market for James Shields has yet to materialize in a similar fashion to the way it did for Jon Lester and Max Scherzer.

Lester was the first to sign, inking a six-year, $155 million contract with the Chicago Cubs during the Winter Meetings. Just over one month later, Scherzer signed a seven-year, $210 million contract with the Washington Nationals, giving them on paper, the best starting rotation in baseball.

With Shields’ free agency having unexpectedly dragged into February, the right-hander may be nearing a decision with multiple options available to him, according to Jon Morosi of FOX Sports:

Throughout the offseason, the number and names of teams to have held talks with Shields or his agent has largely been an unknown. In early December, the Dodgers reportedly expressed an interest in Shields, as well as Lester and Scherzer, who were still available at that time. By early January, some believed Shields had a $110 million offer in hand, which if true, he apparently believed it was in his best interest to pass on.

In a mid-January interview, Dodgers general manager Farhan Zaidi didn’t rule out signing Shields, despite having already added Brett Anderson and Brandon McCarthy, among others, to the pitching staff. Shortly after, it was reported Shields was seeking a contract in the neighborhood of five years and $125 million, while teams were countering with estimates of four years and $80 million.

The Dodgers certainly have the spending power to add Shields to a rotation that would rival the Nationals’ and there’s the connection to Andrew Friedman during their time with the Tampa Bay Rays. While Shields would strengthen the staff, there are concerns accompany signing him; namely his age (33) and the fact that the Dodgers would forfeit their first-round pick.

Shields has pitched at least 203 innings per season in eight of his nine years in the Majors, but long-term contracts for pitchers around his age generally don’t prove to be advantageous for the team. As for the draft pick, the Dodgers in a sense would recoup the one they lose as they hold a compensation pick from the Boston Red Sox by way of them signing Hanley Ramirez.

Another hindrance that may prevent the Dodgers from signing Shields is their interest in Cuban prospect Yoan Moncada, who was ruled a free agent on Tuesday and cleared to sign.

About The Author

Matt is a journalist from Whittier, California. A Cal State Long Beach graduate, Matthew occasionally contributes to Lakers Nation, and previously served as the lead editor and digital strategist at Dodgers Nation, and the co-editor and lead writer at Reign of Troy, where he covered USC Football. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mmoreno1015

3 Responses

  1. Michael N. Norris

    They are not going to sign him and lose a pick…..not this bunch…..they prefer to spend 62 million on 2 guys who will probably wind up on the DL…

    Reply
  2. YARRitsBLAKE

    Would be a bad idea to sign Shields for, at the very least, the number of years he is seeking. He might be a $20 million dollar pitcher, at best, in these next two years, but I doubt he’ll come close to that post-35 years old.

    Reply
  3. Paul Corblies

    screw the pick who would u rather see out there every 5th day James Shields or the likes of losers like Mccarthy or Anderson, this t me is an ABSOLUTE MO BRAINER!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.