Max Scherzer, James Shields

UPDATE (Jan. 18, 3:05 p.m. PT): According to Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports, the Los Angeles Dodgers are not involved with Max Scherzer:

[divide]

In what’s been a relatively quiet free agency for both Max Scherzer and James Shields has suddenly gained more traction and clarity with indications of what their respective deals may wind up as leaking.

With an already potent starting rotation, Chris Cotillo of SB Nation reported Sunday the growing sentiment was the Washington Nationals would win the Scherzer sweepstakes:

Shortly after Cotillo’s report, Jon Heyman of CBS Sports provided more details on the Scherzer free agency talks:

While signing Scherzer would give them arguably the most formidable starting rotations, the Nationals would be open to trading a starter, according to Jon Morosi of FOX Sports:

As for Shields, it’s believed he’s hoping to sing a five-year deal while teams have favored a four-year contract at a considerably less total value, according to Bob Nightengale of USA TODAY Sports:

Unless Shields is in fact able to secure a contract in the neighborhood of $125 million, he may regret passing on a $110 million offer, as some believed he held just under two weeks ago.

While the Dodgers have been mentioned as a potential landing spot for either of the right-handers, it’s difficult to envision them committing to Scherzer for seven years, no matter general manager Farhan Zaidi recently leaving open the possibility of signing either pitcher.

Under that scenario, the Dodgers signing Shields, though three years older than Scherzer, for four years may be a more-likely probability, but that certainly comes with its own share of concerns.

Although the Dodgers bolstered their starting rotation this offseason, a handful of pitchers have some level of injury concerns with Zack Greinke among them. Greinke also holds the power to opt out of his contract after the 2015 season.

If the Dodgers are to sign Scherzer or Shields, they would forfeit their first-round pick in the upcoming 2015 draft.

About The Author

Matt is a journalist from Whittier, California. A Cal State Long Beach graduate, Matthew occasionally contributes to Lakers Nation, and previously served as the lead editor and digital strategist at Dodgers Nation, and the co-editor and lead writer at Reign of Troy, where he covered USC Football. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mmoreno1015

7 Responses

  1. Tmax

    Michael I agree the Dodgers are out of this. IMO Scherzer for 7 or Shields for 5 neither is a good risk. Shields would be a 4 and that is a lot of money for a 4. I understand Kershaw’s contract but with Scherzer I do not think that long of a contract for a pitcher with that many innings is a good risk. Cueto, Zimmerman and others are on the market next year. Take your shot now while we for sure have Greinke and then if he walks go for one of the Free Agents in 2016.

    Reply
    • Taylor Rose

      Excellent Tmax 🙂 One more bullpen arm is what Im hoping for.. hey what ever happened to Chad Bills? Did he retire??? what a comeback candidate he could be.

      Reply
      • Tmax

        So now that the Nats have the arms do the Dodgers reevaluate on Shields?

      • Taylor Rose

        He is the best free agent pitcher left on the market.. but is that a reason to break the bank, oh wait breaking the bank is impossible, I say sign the guy 🙂

  2. Tmax

    Very Glad Scherzer is not going in our division. We do not want the Giants to get him or the Padres for that matter.

    Reply
  3. Steve G

    No way they sign either pitcher. Friedman isn’t interested in giving up a first round pick.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.