in

Dodgers: No Machado? No Harper? No Problem!

Not paying for the high price free agents has worked out for LA.

A few days ago, Tom Verducci at sports illustrated put out a piece on whether Bryce Harper and Manny Machado have lived up to their massive contracts.

It’s an excellent pieces, as are many of Verducci’s pieces. Feel free to give it a read when you’re done reading this. What I want to talk about is how it speaks to the Dodgers front office, and how we as fans see value.

Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics

In his piece, Verducci touches on the fact that Machado and Harper haven’t exactly been overrated in terms of their statistics, but just appearing to be so because of their contracts. It’s a struggle that’s as old as when players could finally get paid big in free agency.

I’m going to compare some of Machado and Harper’s statistics to Max Muncy. Comparing them to Cody Bellinger would seem unfair. Max Muncy is a perfect person to compare them to, for the sake of the point.

Muncy

Machado

Harper

Taking a quick glance, in only a few small categories can one say either Harper or Machado are having a better year than Max Muncy. One could argue that RBI’s and batting average aren’t as important, but I’m not writing about a old school/new school debate. Machado and Harper are pretty even with a 113/114 OPS+. Compared to Muncy’s 131, it’s not even close. Muncy has them beat in both OPS and SLG, too. None of this is surprising to most Dodger fans I would imagine.

Where statistics reveal these truths, the hype and overall machine of Bryce Harper (and admittedly less so, Manny Machado) are what make them feel overrated to most people. If a player like Corey Seager had been a free agent last summer, he sure would have commanded more money. Same goes for Max Muncy, despite his breakout year being only in 2018. The lies we read come from hype backlash. Manny Machado (other than some rather unkind statistics regarding his clutch performances and high-leverage situations) has been as good as advertised, betting his contract with a fan aside. If you’re judging Machado’s performance based on the Padres standing, you’re going to never understand player value. One player does not a playoff team make.

Bryce Harper’s overall WAR and contributions are definitely lower pace than a typical Bryce Harper year. His 2.8 fWAR matches Justin Turner’s fWAR. Justin Turner’s WAR numbers are low because at his age, his defense has gone down. Otherwise, Turner is outhitting Harper in most metrics. So the fact that Harper is definitely having a down year, coupled with the hype and gripe over his new contract, the vultures have definitely circled.

Lack of Team Success

Both the Padres and Phillies are up and coming teams. A handful of ‘experts’ picked the Phillies to win the East or at least the Wild Card, but not everyone. Realistically, they’re still a year or two away from competing. The Padres are a team that most people agree will probably be competitive in a few years. They had a hot start in 2019 that perhaps magnified those expectations. They’ve obviously cooled to a place that’s more realistic. They’re a young team, with young talent. They’ll get better as they learn.

Still, both teams aren’t leading their respective divisions, while just the Phils are on the outside of a Wild Card spot and looking in. That is only making the backlash worse, despite that probably being unfair.

Dodgers Front Office Is Smarter Than Me

Many of us insisted in the off season that signing Harper was a priority for the Dodgers to remain competitive. While most felt it, the majority thought that a big free agent signing was imperative.

From “move Corey Seager to 2nd base and let Machado play SS,” to us justifying to ourselves that the Dodgers didn’t have too many outfielders, it was a hot mess of an off season. The Dodgers front office didn’t operate in this frantic state. Friedman and company knew what they were doing.

(Photo by Harry How/Getty Images)

Cody Bellinger is en route to winning MVP or the runner up. Alex Verdugo has had a great rookie season. Matt Beaty and Will Smith have been hot shot rookies, etc. This could go on. The Dodgers front office knew they had the talent in the organization, and didn’t need to spend upwards of $300 million on a player they’d be paying into their late 30’s.

This isn’t a knock on those contracts, either. The Phillies attendance has gone up this year quite a bit. And the Padres with Machado and potential ROY Fernando Tatis Jr are a fun team to watch. Signing guys like these has helped those respective teams get closer to where they want to be. It just was clear that neither were the best fit for the Dodgers. We didn’t need Harper, and we didn’t need Machado.

I was wrong, and many of us were wrong.

Written by AJ Gonzalez

AJ is a lifelong Dodgers fan who grew up in California. His whole family are also lifelong Dodgers fans. He lives in Tennessee with his wife, daughter, beagle, and strat.

3 Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. Yes, the front office is smarter than 99% of us! They have figured out how to get great production at a fraction of the cost. Huge long contracts are extremely dangerous, See Puljos, Cabrerra, Hamilton, Etc. When they go bad is hurts for 5-10 years.

    When the Dodgers miss its on smaller shorter contracts so they can recover much better and faster. Yes guys like Bret Anderson, Scott Kazmir, and Brandon McCarthy didnt work out, but because of the smaller shorter contracts they were able to minimize the damage and keep winning and keep spending.

    Add to that they have one of the best farm system in terms of talent and development, we are able to churn out cheap talent every year.

    For all those who have been screaming to trade our prospects for win now strategy….well aren’t you glad you dint Trade Bellinger, Buehler, or Seager now?

    We all want the superstars we know about…..but we’ll just have to deal with the superstars we never say coming. I’m looking at you Muncy, Turner, Bellinger, Buehler, etc.

  2. Thanks for admitting you were wrong and fell for the hype. Let’s all remember this in the future. Why have a farm system if you’re plan is to build thru free agency? Every star player was a rookie and Kershaw, Bellinger, Seager, Buehler, Muncy, et al, are stars. If the farm system is good an organization should rarely have to sign a free agent. Then the question becomes”do you sign your own products or replace them with another younger product”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Dodgers

Dodgers: Austin Barnes Quietly Impressing in Triple-A

Dodgers: Russell Martin is Having a Career Year on the Mound