Editorials

How The DH Would Impact The Dodgers

With the news about a possible Designated Hitter coming to the National League, soon, I wondered what impact the DH would have on the Dodgers.

This article won’t be going into whether the DH is good or not for the National League, but I am looking at it as it could be implemented as soon as 2019 but more likely in 2020.

What Is Lost

The Dodgers have a history of having some decent hitting pitchers, and have some now. Pitchers such as Clayton KershawHyun-Jin Ryu, Ross Stripling and Kenta Maeda have sometimes given the Dodgers an advantage. Of course, there have been some awful hitting pitchers that couldn’t even bunt but most of them have moved on. It still boggles the mind that these pitchers can’t even bunt but many haven’t hit much since early in high school. To have someone like Clayton Kershaw who handles the bat and runs the bases well is an advantage that will be lost.

Of course we’d not be able to see any further adventures of “Babe Ryuth” as he’s actually a decent hitter but always fun to watch.

Most importantly, we’d not get to see Rich Hill bat or run the bases again.

DODGERS: THE TOP 5 STARTING PITCHING PROSPECTS HEADING INTO 2019

What is Gained – Lineup Options

As of February 7, 2019 the Dodgers have a glut of players that should be in the lineup. For now I believe the starting candidate players are as follows:

With the DH, the Dodgers would have even more options and ways to exploit their depth. The first thing I’d want to see is a platoon of Joc Pederson and David Freese. What makes this possible is that Joc would DH against right-handers with Max Muncy at 1B. Against left handers Muncy could go to DH and Freese could play 1B.

With Corey Seager recovering from two surgeries, he could start the season as the full-time DH instead of rushing back to the field. Seager’s bat must be in the lineup and, with a DH, it gives him a better shot.

Resting Justin Turner is also a must and the DH would allow his bat to stay in the lineup while shielding him from some wear and tear. The fact that they could rotate most of the starters through the DH spot provides a fresher team later in the season.

Possibilities – Bring In A Big Bat

One of the reasons that the Dodgers have not landed players such as Giancarlo Stanton and Bryce Harper is because they don’t feel they’d age well, yet would still need to play in the field. If there is going to be a DH then it does open up some possibilities. Maybe signing Bryce Harper or Manny Machado starts to make more sense (I’m not giving up yet). There are also players like Edwin Rios or Matt Beaty in the farm system who have a great hit tool but are blocked at the corner infield positions.

Final Thoughts

Laying my cards on the table, I am against bringing the DH to the National League. However, if it does occur, the Dodgers are well positioned to get an advantage over others in the National League. Given the resting opportunities maybe they are better rested in October. It would also make the job of Dave Roberts easier. How many times did he burn through the short bench he had? Maybe they go out and get an extra bat, especially a right-handed one. I do hope the DH stays away from the NL but if it does the Dodgers are in great shape to take advantage of it.

BY THE NUMBERS: THE DODGERS ARE BETTER THAN YOU THINK

Tim Rogers

A fan of the Dodgers since 1973 since I got my first baseball cards while living in Long Beach. I came to San Diego for college and never left nor did I ever switch my Dodgers' allegiance. Some know me as the "sweater guy". #ProspectHugger

8 Comments

  1. Platoon Muncy. He just hit 35 Home runs and you would platoon him? Not making sense on that part. The platoon used by Roberts is what did them in in the World Series.

    1. Agree with ya on that bigrickdeemann. I said yesterday that at the outset, there are LF, CF, RF, 2nd base and 1st base as potential for platooning because of the fact we have so many players made marginal ones as a result of it. Muncy belongs in the AL as DH but that’s just my view on him.

    2. Tim never said platoon Muncy. He said play Pederson at DH and Muncy at 1B against RH and Muncy at DH and Freese at 1B against LH.

  2. MY position on the DH? It’s the same as I have stated before in that it should be in BOTH LEAGUES OR NEITHER LEAGUE AT ALL! To me baseball is just dead wrong in allowing it to be in one league and not the other.

  3. Most sports teams like it or not are Billion Dollar enterprises. Star Pitchers are highly paid and valuable to the team. When you do not do something repeatedly a player’s skill level at that task be it batting or base running drops. Teams are coming to the understanding that risking a star pitcher to an accident batting or baserunning jeopardizes their business.
    I believe the DH is inevitable. I also believe that with the constant infield shifts run scoring and the offense have been impacted to the point of rendering games unwatchable. Seeing guys swinging for the fences and not advancing runners etc is not the baseball I grew up watching nor is it in any way entertaining.
    That is what I would address if I were in charge of the MLB.

  4. The DH would benefit the Dodgers by solving a lot of their self induced issues of having too many good players sitting on the bench

    1. I think it would especially benefit big market clubs but the cap is an equalizer. The Dodgers would manipulate the DH better than most as they are very clever that way…Just like they manipulated the DH last year….Sometimes I think they get too clever but …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button