in

Dodgers: Ownership Not Forcing Andrew Friedman to Stay Under Luxury Tax

The Dodgers might be poised to spend on some luxury items.

This is some excellent news. With arguably the biggest offseason ahead for the Dodgers, it appears that they are poised to spend. The Dodgers’ ownership group, vaguely referred to as Guggenheim Baseball Management, has forced Andrew Friedman’s hand in past seasons in terms of staying below the luxury tax. The Dodgers barely stayed under this past season and have zero restrictions heading into the 2020 offseason.

According to a recent column by Jorge Castillo of The Athletic, the Dodgers’ ownership group is not forcing Andrew Friedman to remain under the luxury tax with his offseason moves.

Friedman Operating

The Dodgers have never given a free agent over $60 million that was not their own under the Friedman regime. That might change. Here is an excerpt from Castillo’s column that demonstrates the Dodgers’ potential willingness to spend.

But Andrew Friedman, the team’s president of baseball operations, insisted the organization has not shied from acquiring expensive, premier talent. He also maintained he has not been directed to stay under the competitive-balance tax threshold of a $208-million payroll after not eclipsing the line the last two seasons.

The quote from Friedman himself really drives this point home:

“We just don’t have hard-and-fast rules. We’re open to different avenues and different levers of how to get better. And I can’t sit here right now and tell you what that means because I don’t know.”

The Dodgers are locks to evaluate all avenues of the market, but will be selective of who they pounce on. The organization — Andrew Friedman, in particular — has expressed that the Dodgers do not plan to be stupid in their operations this offseason. However, it might be time to get ‘stupid’ after a disappointing two World Series losses and an NLDS exit.

Overall

The Dodgers need to make a big move and ownership not instructing Friedman to operate as a below-cap team is integral. If there is a point in time where the Dodgers should spend money, it is now.

Written by Daniel Preciado

My name is Daniel Preciado and I am 18 years old. I am a sophomore Sport Analytics major and Cognitive Science and Economics dual minor at Syracuse University. When I am not in New York, I live in Whittier, California --- not too far from Chavez Ravine. I am pretty old-school for being an analytics guy and I will always embrace debate. Also, Chase Utley did absolutely nothing wrong.

2 Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. They have accumulated enough money with their shady ways that they can sign Cole Strasburg, Betances and Rendon. Rotation of Cole, Strasburg, Buehler, Gonsolin and May will be the best in all of baseball, everyone else can get traded or take a hike. Bentances and Jansen at the back end.

  2. EIGHT BILLION dollars over 20 years. That’s what Guggenheim made, even if no one watched one game ever again. In actuality, the way things are, that may be kinda true.
    $8,000,000,000.
    That’s 8,000 millions.
    And they’re worried about a luxury tax?
    They best use some of them billions, because if they don’t win, people will cease filling the stadium with the new $100 MILLION remodel.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Dodgers Continue to be Linked to Red Sox Outfielder Mookie Betts

Dodgers: Andrew Friedman Names Current 2020 Starting Rotation